Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33544443›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Disparities in colorectal cancer screening among breast and prostate cancer survivors.

Chiranjeev Dash, Jiachen Lu, Vicky Parikh, Stacey Wathen, Samay Shah, Ruchi Shah Chaudhari, Lucile Adams-Campbell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiranjeev DashOffice of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3314-8461
Jiachen LuOffice of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Vicky ParikhMedStar Shah Medical Group, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Stacey WathenMedStar Shah Medical Group, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Samay ShahMedStar Shah Medical Group, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Ruchi Shah ChaudhariMedStar Shah Medical Group, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Lucile Adams-CampbellOffice of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-3884
MedStar Health · USOffice of Minority Health · US

Funding

Molecular Epidemiology of Oxidative Stress and Related Cancers in Black WomenK07CA197112 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DASH, CHIRANJEEV · 2016 to 2020
$655k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA197112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended as an integral part of cancer survivorship care. We compared the rates of CRC screening among breast and prostate cancer survivors by primary cancer type, patient, and geographic characteristics in a community-based health-care system with a mix of large and small metro urban areas. MATERIALS AND

methodsData for this retrospective study were abstracted from medical records of a multi-specialty practice serving about 250,000 individuals in southern Maryland. Breast (N = 1056) and prostate (N = 891) cancer patients diagnosed prior to 2015 were followed up till June 2018. Screening colonoscopy within the last 10 years was considered to be guideline concordant. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the prevalence odds ratios of being concordant on CRC screening by age, gender, race, metro area type, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension.

resultsOverall 51% of survivors had undergone a screening colonoscopy. However, there was a difference in CRC screening rate between prostate (54%) and breast (44%) cancer survivors. Older age (≥65 years), being a breast cancer survivor compared to prostate cancer, and living in a large compared to small metropolitan area were associated with a lower probability of receiving CRC screening. Having hypertension was associated with higher likelihood of being current on colonoscopy screening guidelines among survivors; but diabetes and obesity were not associated with CRC screening.

conclusionsLow levels of CRC screening utilization were found among breast and prostate cancer survivors in a single center in Southern Maryland. Gender, comorbidities, and residential factors were associated with receipt of CRC screening.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAgedBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsDistrict of ColumbiaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective Studiesbreast cancercancer survivorshipcolonoscopycolorectal cancerprostate cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID33544443
PMCPMC7926020
OpenAlexW3129012761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.