Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33544389›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2021

What prompts patients to present with delirium?

Kate Gibb, Anastasia Krywonos, Runil Shah, Anjali Jha, Daniel Davis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence of Delirium in End-of-Life Palliative Care Patients: An Observational Study.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kate GibbAcute Medical Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4817-1891
Anastasia KrywonosAcute Medical Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Runil ShahAcute Medical Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Anjali JhaAcute Medical Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Daniel DavisAcute Medical Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. daniel.davis@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-1955
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 107467/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust WT107467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the recognition, response and understanding of delirium in families and carers of hospitalised patients.

methodsAll adults with delirium admitted to an acute medical unit were included. Delirium was diagnosed by a specialist geriatrician. The responder who sought medical advice for each patient was interviewed using a delirium recognition questionnaire. Vital status was ascertained at four months.

resultsSixty patients were included (mean age 85, SD 6.8 years). Reported symptoms included drowsiness and lack of responsiveness, though these were less commonly recognised as being due to delirium. 76% received medical advice within 24 h, although two responders took > 1 week. One-third of responders had never heard of delirium. Delirium knowledge among responders was variable.

conclusionOverall awareness and knowledge of delirium was poor. Community delirium education and public health initiatives may improve rapidity of recognition, delirium assessment, and potentially health outcomes.

Indexed as

DeliriumAdultAged, 80 and overCaregiversHospitalizationHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAwarenessDeliriumRecognitionResponse

Identifiers

PMID33544389
PMCPMC8149353
OpenAlexW3127728095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.