Trial reportTargeted oncology2021
Osimertinib Versus Comparator EGFR TKI as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: FLAURA China, A Randomized Study.
Trial report in Targeted oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 113 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Clinical Study of the Combination of Anlotinib and Aumolertinib in the First-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR 21L858R Mutation
Who cites it
113 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of first, second, and third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Pooled it
- Antibody-based regimens targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and VEGF/VEGFR in advanced or metastatic NSCLC: a meta-analysis of RCTs.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Hepatotoxicity and efficacy associated with first- and new-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative analysis of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Guideline
- Pooled it
- First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Feasibility and safety of EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC: A meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Mefatinib versus gefitinib as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase III study.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Trial
- Double-dose firmonertinib as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR L858R mutation: a prospective, multicenter, phase II study (FIRM).Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus osimertinib for patients with advanced NSCLC with concomitant EGFR and TP53 mutations: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Capivasertib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: phase 3 CAPItello-291 study extended Chinese cohort.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy vs Gefitinib Alone in Untreated EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Brain Metastases: The GAP BRAIN Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Clinicopathological characteristics and therapeutic outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboringAnnals of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- First-line third-generation EGFR-TKIs for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the global FLAURA study, first-line osimertinib, a third-generation irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus comparator EGFR TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
objectiveThe FLAURA China study assessed first-line osimertinib in Chinese patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC (NCT02296125).
methodsFLAURA China was a double-blind, randomized, phase III study. Adults from mainland China with previously untreated EGFRm (Exon 19 deletion or L858R) advanced NSCLC were enrolled in the global study or a China-only study under the same protocol; 136 patients were randomized to osimertinib (80 mg once daily [od]; n = 71) or comparator EGFR TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib; all sites selected gefitinib 250 mg od; n = 65). Patients were randomized and allocated to treatment groups by a central computer system. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a secondary endpoint.
resultsAll 136 randomized patients were analyzed. Osimertinib extended median PFS by 8.0 months versus comparator EGFR TKI (17.8 vs. 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.85). Median OS was 33.1 months in the osimertinib group versus 25.7 months in the comparator group (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.56-1.29). At 3 years, 20% of patients on osimertinib and 8% on the comparator remained on randomized treatment. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were reported in 54 and 28% of patients in the osimertinib and comparator groups, respectively, driven by increased local reporting of laboratory- and disease-related AEs. No new safety signals were identified.
conclusionsFirst-line osimertinib treatment resulted in a clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefit versus comparator EGFR TKI in Chinese patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of osimertinib. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02296125, registered 20 November 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.