Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33544300›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2021

Combining Clickstream Analyses and Graph-Modeled Data Clustering for Identifying Common Response Processes.

Esther Ulitzsch, Qiwei He, Vincent Ulitzsch, Hendrik Molter, André Nichterlein, Rolf Niedermeier, Steffi Pohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esther UlitzschEducational Measurement, IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Olshausenstraße 62, 24118,  Kiel, Germany. ulitzsch@leibniz-ipn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9267-8542
Qiwei HeEducational Testing Service, Princeton, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8942-2047
Vincent UlitzschTechnische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hendrik MolterTechnische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
André NichterleinTechnische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rolf NiedermeierTechnische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Steffi PohlFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-8171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex interactive test items are becoming more widely used in assessments. Being computer-administered, assessments using interactive items allow logging time-stamped action sequences. These sequences pose a rich source of information that may facilitate investigating how examinees approach an item and arrive at their given response. There is a rich body of research leveraging action sequence data for investigating examinees' behavior. However, the associated timing data have been considered mainly on the item-level, if at all. Considering timing data on the action-level in addition to action sequences, however, has vast potential to support a more fine-grained assessment of examinees' behavior. We provide an approach that jointly considers action sequences and action-level times for identifying common response processes. In doing so, we integrate tools from clickstream analyses and graph-modeled data clustering with psychometrics. In our approach, we (a) provide similarity measures that are based on both actions and the associated action-level timing data and (b) subsequently employ cluster edge deletion for identifying homogeneous, interpretable, well-separated groups of action patterns, each describing a common response process. Guidelines on how to apply the approach are provided. The approach and its utility are illustrated on a complex problem-solving item from PIAAC 2012.

Indexed as

ComputersProblem SolvingCluster AnalysisPsychometricsaction sequencescluster editingcomplex problem solvingresponse times

Identifiers

PMID33544300
PMCPMC8035117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.