Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33544167›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

A clinically practical radiomics-clinical combined model based on PET/CT data and nomogram predicts EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma.

Cheng Chang, Shihong Zhou, Hong Yu, Wenlu Zhao, Yaqiong Ge, Shaofeng Duan, Rui Wang, Xiaohua Qian, Bei Lei, Lihua Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Predictive value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Predictive Value ofCurrent medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Subregion-specificAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Predictive value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  18. The predictive value of [EJNMMI research · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng ChangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Shihong ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Hong YuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Wenlu ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 1055 Sanxiang Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China.
Yaqiong GeGE Healthcare China, Pudong New Town, No. 1, Huatuo Road, Shanghai, 210000, China.
Shaofeng DuanGE Healthcare China, Pudong New Town, No. 1, Huatuo Road, Shanghai, 210000, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Xiaohua QianInstitute for Medical Imaging Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Bei LeiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Lihua WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Liu LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Maomei RuanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Hui YanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Xiaoyan Sun *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Wenhui Xie *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, 200030, China. xknuclear@163.com.
Shanghai Chest Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81602415National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671679National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773007National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871353Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 18ZR1435200Shanghai Municipal Population and Family Planning Commission 20174Y0077Shanghai Sailing Program 20YF1444500Special project of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in general hospital of Shanghai Health Committee ZHYY-ZXYJHZX-202023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to develop a clinically practical model to predict EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma patients according to radiomics signatures based on PET/CT and clinical risk factors.

methodsThis retrospective study included 583 lung adenocarcinoma patients, including 295 (50.60%) patients with EGFR mutation and 288 (49.40%) patients without EGFR mutation. The clinical risk factors associated with lung adenocarcinoma were collected at the same time. We developed PET/CT, CT, and PET radiomics models for the prediction of EGFR mutation using multivariate logistic regression analysis, respectively. We also constructed a combined PET/CT radiomics-clinical model by nomogram analysis. The diagnostic performance and clinical net benefit of this risk-scoring model were examined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis while the clinical usefulness of this model was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsThe ROC analysis showed predictive performance for the PET/CT radiomics model (AUC = 0.76), better than the PET model (AUC = 0.71, Delong test: Z = 3.03, p value = 0.002) and the CT model (AUC = 0.74, Delong test: Z = 1.66, p value = 0.098). Also, the PET/CT radiomics-clinical combined model has a better performance (AUC = 0.84) to predict EGFR mutation than the PET/CT radiomics model (AUC = 0.76, Delong test: D = 2.70, df = 790.81, p value < 0.001) or the clinical model (AUC = 0.81, Delong test: Z = 3.46, p value < 0.001).

conclusionsWe demonstrated that the combined PET/CT radiomics-clinical model has an advantage to predict EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics from lung tumor increase the efficiency of the prediction for EGFR mutation in clinical lung adenocarcinoma on PET/CT. • A radiomic nomogram was developed to predict EGFR mutation. • Combining PET/CT radiomics-clinical model has an advantage to predict EGFR mutation.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansMutationNomogramsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsEpidermal growth factor receptorLung adenocarcinomaPET/CTRadiomicsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID33544167
OpenAlexW3126573798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.