Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33544086›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2021

Evaluating the Instructional Design and Effect on Knowledge, Teamwork, and Skills of Technology-Enhanced Simulation-Based Training in Obstetrics in Uganda: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.

Anne Antonia Cornelia van Tetering, Maartje Henrica Martine Segers, Peter Ntuyo, Imelda Namagambe, M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt, Josaphat K Byamugisha, S Guid Oei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne Antonia Cornelia van TeteringDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2185-872X
Maartje Henrica Martine SegersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4565-5559
Peter NtuyoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mulago Hospital, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5343-0392
Imelda NamagambeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mulago Hospital, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-7302
M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der JagtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-5333
Josaphat K ByamugishaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mulago Hospital, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-9662
S Guid OeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0157-3332
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMulago Hospital · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation-based training is a common strategy for improving the quality of facility-based maternity services and is often evaluated using Kirkpatrick's theoretical model. The results on the Kirkpatrick levels are closely related to the quality of the instructional design of a training program. The instructional design is generally defined as the "set of prescriptions for teaching methods to improve the quality of instruction with a goal of optimizing learning outcomes."

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the instructional design of a technology-enhanced simulation-based training in obstetrics, the reaction of participants, and the effect on knowledge, teamwork, and skills in a low-income country.

methodsA stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial was performed in a university hospital in Kampala, Uganda, with an annual delivery volume of over 31,000. In November 2014, a medical simulation center was installed with a full-body birthing simulator (Noelle S550, Gaumard Scientific), an interactive neonate (Simon S102 Newborn CPR Simulator, Gaumard Scientific), and an audio and video recording system. Twelve local obstetricians were trained and certified as medical simulation trainers. From 2014 to 2016, training was provided to 57 residents in groups of 6 to 9 students. Descriptive statistics were calculated for ten instructional design features of the training course measured by the 42-item ID-SIM (Instructional Design of a Simulation Improved by Monitoring). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was conducted to investigate the differences in scores on knowledge, the Clinical Teamwork Scale, and medical technical skills.

resultsThe mean scores on the ten instructional design features ranged from 54.9 (95% CI 48.5-61.3) to 84.3 (95% CI 80.9-87.6) out of 100. The highest mean score was given on the feature feedback and the lowest scores on repetitive practice and controlled environment. The overall score for the training day was 92.8 out of 100 (95% CI 89.5-96.1). Knowledge improved significantly, with a test score of 63.4% (95% CI 60.7-66.1) before and 78.9% (95% CI 76.8-81.1) after the training (P<.001). The overall score on the 10-point Clinical Teamwork Scale was 6.0 (95% CI 4.4-7.6) before and 5.9 (95% CI 4.5-7.2) after the training (P=.78). Medical technical skills were scored at 55.5% (95% CI 47.2-63.8) before and 65.6% (95% CI 56.5-74.7) after training (P=.08).

conclusionsMost instructional design features of a technology-enhanced simulation-based training in obstetrics in a low-income country were scored high, although intervals were large. The overall score for the training day was high, and knowledge did improve after the training program, but no changes in teamwork and (most) medical technical skills were found. The lowest-scored instructional design features may be improved to achieve further learning aims.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN98617255; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN98617255. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12884-020-03050-3.

Indexed as

instructional designlow- and middle-income countriesmedical educationobstetricssimulation training

Identifiers

PMID33544086
PMCPMC8081249
OpenAlexW3035292487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.