Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543787›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of psychology2021

The behavioral effects of cooperative and competitive board games in preschoolers.

Malin Eriksson, Ben Kenward, Leo Poom, Gunilla Stenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Malin ErikssonDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-2453
Ben KenwardDepartment of Psychology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Leo PoomDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gunilla StenbergDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEOxford Brookes University · GB

Funding

European Research Council StGCACTUS-312292Swedish Research Council 241-2011-1785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional board games are a common social activity for many children, but little is known about the behavioral effects of this type of game. The current study aims to explore the behavioral effects of cooperative and competitive board games in four-to-six-year-old children (N = 65). Repeatedly during 6 weeks, children in groups of four played either cooperative or competitive board games in a between-subject design, and shortly after each game conducted a task in which children's cooperative, prosocial, competitive, and antisocial behavior were observed. The type of board game did not have an effect on cooperative, prosocial or antisocial behavior. Cooperative and competitive board games elicited equal amounts of cooperative and prosocial behavior, which suggest that board games, regardless of type, could have positive effects on preschoolers' social behavior. Our results suggest that children may compete more after playing competitive board games; but the measure of competitive behavior in particular was unreliable. Preschoolers enjoyed playing cooperative board games more than competitive board games, which may be one reason to prefer their use.

Indexed as

Competitive BehaviorVideo GamesAltruismAntisocial Personality DisorderChildChild, PreschoolCooperative BehaviorEmotionsHumansAntisocial behaviorboard gamescompetitioncooperationpreschoolersprosocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID33543787
PMCPMC8248432
OpenAlexW3126732793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.