Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543755›Full record

Observational studySchizophrenia bulletin2021

There Is Life After the UK Clozapine Central Non-Rechallenge Database.

Ebenezer Oloyede, Cecilia Casetta, Olubanke Dzahini, Aviv Segev, Fiona Gaughran, Sukhi Shergill, Alek Mijovic, Marinka Helthuis, Eromona Whiskey, James Hunter MacCabe and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Genetic identification of undiagnosed benign ethnic neutropenia in patients receiving clozapine treatment.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ebenezer OloyedePharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1352-4017
Cecilia CasettaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Olubanke DzahiniPharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Aviv SegevDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Fiona GaughranDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sukhi ShergillDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Alek MijovicKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Marinka HelthuisLeyden Delta B.V., Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eromona WhiskeyPharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
James Hunter MacCabeDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
David TaylorPharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College London · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901868Medical Research Council MC_PC_17214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIn the United Kingdom, patients on clozapine whose hematological parameters fall below certain thresholds are placed on the Central Non-Rechallenge Database (CNRD), meaning that they cannot be prescribed clozapine again except under exceptional circumstances. This practice was discontinued in the United States in 2015 by expanding the hematological monitoring guidelines, allowing more patients to receive clozapine. Our objective was to investigate the implications this policy change would have on clozapine utilization in the United Kingdom.

methodsThis was an observational, retrospective analysis of patients registered on the CNRD in a large mental health trust. The first objective was to compare the number of patients placed on the CNRD under the United Kingdom and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria. The second objective was to explore the hematological and clinical outcomes of CNRD patients. The third objective was to investigate the hematological outcomes of patients rechallenged on clozapine after nonrechallengeable status.

resultsOne hundred and fifteen patients were placed on CNRD from 2002 to 2019, of whom 7 (6%) met the equivalent criteria for clozapine discontinuation under the FDA guidelines. Clinical outcomes, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale, were worse 3 months after clozapine cessation than on clozapine (t = -7.4862; P < .001). Sixty-two (54%) patients placed on CNRD were rechallenged. Fifty-nine of those (95%) were successfully rechallenged; 3 patients were placed back on CNRD, only one of which would have had to stop clozapine again under FDA criteria.

conclusionImplementation of the updated FDA's monitoring criteria in the United Kingdom would significantly reduce clozapine discontinuation due to hematological reasons. The evidence suggests an urgent need for revising the UK clozapine monitoring guidelines to improve outcomes in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualWithholding TreatmentAdultAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineFemaleHematologic DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesSchizophrenia, Treatment-ResistantUnited KingdomAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineclozapineclozapine central non-rechallenge databaseclozapine rechallengeneutropenia

Identifiers

PMID33543755
PMCPMC8266568
OpenAlexW3127911085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.