ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2021
Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 315 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
315 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evidence on the association of overall dietary factors, selected environmental, medical, demographic, and biological factors and developmental defects of enamel, including MIH and enamel fluorosis.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Pooled it
- A cross-age odyssey of cognitive reading attributes: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Perioperative education for patients undergoing colorectal stoma surgery: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Scoping review on the relationship between microRNAs (miRNAs) and short sleep disorder or insomnia with short sleep duration.Sleep medicine: X · 2026Article
- State of the art on advanced practice nursing role management international theories, models and frameworks: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Article
- Salivary parameters in individuals undergoing orthodontic treatment with clear aligners: a scoping review.Evidence-based dentistry · 2026Article
- Magnesium therapy in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Beyond the sum of its parts: a scoping review on complex mental health care needs.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Review
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Review
- Occupational Distress Among Nurses Through Social Media Narratives: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Student Incivility and Its Management From a Nursing Academic's Perspective: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- First Contact Physiotherapists (FCPs) Referral Practices to Rheumatology: A Scoping Review of the Evidence Base.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- Core Components of Effective Home Visiting Programmes and Parenting Interventions Delivered by Nurses and Midwives-A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Sexual and reproductive health literacy among East Asian women: a scoping review protocol using an intersectionality lens.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Post-Heart Transplant Changes and Perceived Donor-Recipient Correspondences: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Quality of Life in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Article
255 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best-practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research.
designDiscussion Paper. DATA SOURCES: Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR). IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND MIDWIFERY: Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency.
conclusionThis study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery. IMPACT: With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.