Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543462›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021

In Vitro Assays for Nanoparticle-Cancer Cell Interaction Studies.

Tomás Bauleth-Ramos, Bruno Sarmento

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomás Bauleth-Ramosi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Bruno Sarmentoi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. bruno.sarmento@ineb.up.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology is a rapid-growing field with an extreme potential to revolutionize cancer treatments. However, despite the rapid advances, the clinical translation is still scarce. One of the main hurdles contributing for this setback is the lack of reliable in vitro models for preclinical testing capable of predicting the outcomes in an in vivo setting. In fact, the use of 2D monolayers, considered the gold-standard in vitro technique, leads to the creation of misleading data that might not be completely observed in in vivo or clinical setting. Thus, there is the need to use more complex models capable of better mimicking the tumor microenvironment. For that purpose, the development and use of multicellular tumor spheroids, three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures which recapitulate numerous aspects of the tumors, represents an advantageous approach to test the developed anticancer therapies. In this chapter, we identify and discuss the advantages of the use of these 3D cellular models compared to the 2D models and how they can be utilized to study nanoparticle-cancer cell interaction in a more reliable way to predict the treatment outcome in vivo.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNeoplasmsCell CommunicationCell Line, TumorHumansSpheroids, CellularTumor Microenvironment3DCancerDistributionEfficacyExtracellular matrixHigh throughput screeningIn VitroNanoparticlesNanotechnologySpheroidsToxicityTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.