Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543442›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2021

Deep Learning-based Classification of Resting-state fMRI Independent-component Analysis.

Victor Nozais, Philippe Boutinaud, Violaine Verrecchia, Marie-Fateye Gueye, Pierre-Yves Hervé, Christophe Tzourio, Bernard Mazoyer, Marc Joliot

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victor NozaisGinesislab, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2529-1839
Philippe BoutinaudGinesislab, Bordeaux, France.
Violaine VerrecchiaGinesislab, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2385-3079
Marie-Fateye GueyeGinesislab, Bordeaux, France.
Pierre-Yves HervéGinesislab, Bordeaux, France.
Christophe TzourioBordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR1219, Bordeaux University, Inserm, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6517-2984
Bernard MazoyerGinesislab, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0970-2837
Marc JoliotGinesislab, Bordeaux, France. marc.joliot@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7792-308X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d’Aquitaine · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity analyses of fMRI data have shown that the activity of the brain at rest is spatially organized into resting-state networks (RSNs). RSNs appear as groups of anatomically distant but functionally tightly connected brain regions. Inter-RSN intrinsic connectivity analyses may provide an optimal spatial level of integration to analyze the variability of the functional connectome. Here we propose a deep learning approach to enable the automated classification of individual independent-component (IC) decompositions into a set of predefined RSNs. Two databases were used in this work, BIL&GIN and MRi-Share, with 427 and 1811 participants, respectively. We trained a multilayer perceptron (MLP) to classify each IC as one of 45 RSNs, using the IC classification of 282 participants in BIL&GIN for training and a 5-dimensional parameter grid search for hyperparameter optimization. It reached an accuracy of 92 %. Predictions for the remaining individuals in BIL&GIN were tested against the original classification and demonstrated good spatial overlap between the cortical RSNs. As a first application, we created an RSN atlas based on MRi-Share. This atlas defined a brain parcellation in 29 RSNs covering 96 % of the gray matter. Second, we proposed an individual-based analysis of the subdivision of the default-mode network into 4 networks. Minimal overlap between RSNs was found except in the angular gyrus and potentially in the precuneus. We thus provide the community with an individual IC classifier that can be used to analyze one dataset or to statistically compare different datasets for RSN spatial definitions.

Indexed as

ConnectomeDeep LearningBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetArtificial intelligenceBrain functional networkClassification.Independent‐component analysisNeuroimaging cohortResting‐state

Identifiers

PMID33543442
OpenAlexW3127344821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.