ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2021
Combining targeted sequencing and ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing for accurate somatic copy number alteration detection.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- From multi-omics to deep learning: advances in cfDNA-based liquid biopsy for multi-cancer screening.Biomarker research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the feasibility of combining targeted sequencing and ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) for improved somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) detection, due to its role in tumorigenesis and prognosis. Cerebrospinal fluid and matched blood samples were obtained from 29 patients with brain metastasis derived from lung cancer. Samples were subjected to targeted sequencing (genomic coverage: 300 kb) and 2×ULP-WGS. The SCNA was detected by the CTLW_CNV, Control-FreeC, and CNVkit methods and their accuracy was analyzed. Eighteen tumor samples showed consistent SCNA results between the three methods, while a small fraction of samples resulted in different SCNA estimations. Further analysis indicated that consistency of SCNA highly correlated with the difference of baseline depth (normalized depth of regions without SCNA events) estimation between methods. Conflict Index showed that CTLW_CNV significantly improved the accuracy of SCNA detection through precise baseline depth estimation. CTLW_CNV combines targeted sequencing and ULP-WGS for improved SCNA detection. The improvement in detection accuracy is mainly due to a refined baseline depth estimation, guided by single-nucleotide polymorphism allele frequencies within the deeply sequenced region (targeted sequencing). This method is especially suitable for tumor samples with biased aneuploidy, a previously under-estimated genomic characteristic across different cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.