Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543309›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2021

[Shoulder arthroplasty].

Dennis Wassenaar, André Busch, Alexander Wegner, Marcus Jäger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dennis WassenaarKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, St. Marien-Hospital Mülheim an der Ruhr GmbH, Kaiserstr. 50, 45468, Mülheim/Ruhr, Deutschland. d.wassenaar@contilia.de.
André BuschKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, St. Marien-Hospital Mülheim an der Ruhr GmbH, Kaiserstr. 50, 45468, Mülheim/Ruhr, Deutschland.
Alexander WegnerKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, St. Marien-Hospital Mülheim an der Ruhr GmbH, Kaiserstr. 50, 45468, Mülheim/Ruhr, Deutschland.
Marcus JägerKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, St. Marien-Hospital Mülheim an der Ruhr GmbH, Kaiserstr. 50, 45468, Mülheim/Ruhr, Deutschland.
St. Marien Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthroplasty of the shoulder joint leads to excellent clinical results if the indications are valid and the implantation is technically correct. Taking anatomical requirements and mechanical functions as well as material properties and developments in surgical techniques into account, articulations and anchoring systems have been developed which, as modular systems enable successful restoration of the biomechanics and consider the importance of the surrounding soft tissues. Scientific data show promising medium-term and long-term results in terms of functionality and pain reduction. Nevertheless, due to the limited bone stock for implant anchoring, especially loosening of the prosthesis or instability of the glenoid joint component, revision arthroplasty remains challenging. This review article summarizes the relevant aspects of shoulder arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderShoulder JointShoulder ProsthesisHumansProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureReoperationTreatment OutcomeHumeral head replacementModular systemsRevision arthroplastyShaft-anchored prosthesisShoulder joint

Identifiers

PMID33543309
OpenAlexW4205317273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.