Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543136›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2020

Preoperative transcranial magnetic stimulation for picture naming is reliable in mapping segments of the arcuate fasciculus.

Davide Giampiccolo, Henrietta Howells, Ina Bährend, Heike Schneider, Giovanni Raffa, Tizian Rosenstock, Francesco Vergani, Peter Vajkoczy, Thomas Picht

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Davide GiampiccoloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3849-4168
Henrietta HowellsMoCa Laboratory, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Ina BährendDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Heike SchneiderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Giovanni RaffaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Messina University Hospital, Italy.
Tizian RosenstockDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Francesco VerganiDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Peter VajkoczyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas PichtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In preoperative planning for neurosurgery, both anatomical (diffusion imaging tractography) and functional tools (MR-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation) are increasingly used to identify and preserve eloquent language structures specific to individuals. Using these tools in healthy adults shows that speech production errors occur mainly in perisylvian cortical sites that correspond to subject-specific terminations of the major language pathway, the arcuate fasciculus. It is not clear whether this correspondence remains in oncological patients with altered tissue. We studied a heterogeneous cohort of 30 patients (fourteen male, mean age 44), undergoing a first or second surgery for a left hemisphere brain tumour in a language-eloquent region, to test whether speech production errors induced by preoperative transcranial magnetic stimulation had consistent anatomical correspondence to the arcuate fasciculus. We used navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during picture naming and recorded different perisylvian sites where transient interference to speech production occurred. Spherical deconvolution diffusion imaging tractography was performed to map the direct fronto-temporal and indirect (fronto-parietal and parieto-temporal) segments of the arcuate fasciculus in each patient. Speech production errors were reported in all patients when stimulating the frontal lobe, and in over 90% of patients in the parietal lobe. Errors were less frequent in the temporal lobe (54%). In all patients, at least one error site corresponded to a termination of the arcuate fasciculus, particularly in the frontal and parietal lobes, despite distorted anatomy due to a lesion and/or previous resection. Our results indicate that there is strong correspondence between terminations of the arcuate fasciculus and speech errors. This indicates that white matter anatomy may be a robust marker for identifying functionally eloquent cortex, particularly in the frontal and parietal lobe. This knowledge may improve targets for preoperative mapping of language in the neurosurgical setting.

Indexed as

arcuatelanguageTMStractographytumour

Identifiers

PMID33543136
PMCPMC7846168
OpenAlexW3091009416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.