ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2020
Effects of Visual Feedback During Recumbent Stepping in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of intermittent visual feedback (using the Balanced Power program on the NuStep Transitt) during recumbent stepping on strength, balance, and functional mobility in individuals with chronic stroke.
designQuasi-experimental 1-group pretest-posttest study.
settingHuman performance research laboratory.
participantsAdults (N=11; 7 female; mean age, 58.7±13.6y), >6 months post stroke.
interventionsEight 45-minute training sessions on the NuStep Transitt (visits 2-9) twice a week (5-minute warm-up and cooldown with 35 minutes of training [5min with and then without visual feedback regarding left/right lower extremity percentage effort]). Visits 1 and 10: pre- and post assessment.
main outcome measuresSelf-selected and fast gait speeds; maximum voluntary contractions (MVCs) of knee extension and flexion and ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion; and 5 times sit-to-stand (5TSTS).
resultsSignificant improvements in 5TSTS (14.2s,
conclusionsThe NuStep Transitt is a valuable tool that provides real-time feedback about percentage of use of the hemiparetic leg. This intervention study has demonstrated that the addition of visual feedback about left/right percentage effort while exercising on the Transitt has significant and clinically relevant effects on the functional mobility of individuals with chronic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.