ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2020
Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Screening Program for People With Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delivering Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Care in Parkinson's Disease: An International Consensus Statement.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Frameworks for Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation Addressing When, What, and How.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021Review
- It Takes a Village: Patient Satisfaction in a Specialized Atypical Parkinsonism Interdisciplinary Clinic.Brain and neuroscience advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the characteristics of people with Parkinson disease and movement disorders (PDMDs) referred by neurologist to a physiatrist-led interdisciplinary rehabilitation screening program.
designRetrospective data analysis of electronic health records (EMRs).
settingOutpatient PDMD neurology clinic and an interdisciplinary rehabilitation hospital's PDMD screening program.
participantsPeople with PDMDs referred by neurologists to the interdisciplinary rehabilitation screening program from 2009-2017 (n=934), with early referrals from 2009-2015 (n=449) and recently referred from 2015-2017 (n=485), and patients who had new interdisciplinary rehabilitation screening program evaluations from 2015-2017 (n=183).
interventionParticipation in the physiatrist-led PDMD screening clinic.
main outcome measuresDemographics, disease-related features, timed Up and Go, conversational voice volume, recommended therapy services, and number of therapies completed 90 days following interdisciplinary rehabilitation screening program.
resultsPeople referred from the neurologists to the interdisciplinary rehabilitation screening program from 2009-2017 were 72±12.9 years old, male (56%), white (65%), and with 1 or more comorbidities (62%). Compared with early referrals from 2009-2015, more recently referred participants from 2015-2017 were younger (
conclusionsThe interdisciplinary rehabilitation screening program was sustained with increased number of referrals over time, occurring earlier in the disease in more recent years. Key strategies used to sustain the program over time include development of a unique referral order set for the neurologists, implementation of a comprehensive screen tool in the rehabilitation hospital EMR, and centralized communication through social workers at both facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.