Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543081›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2020

Cerebral Palsy Research Network Clinical Registry: Methodology and Baseline Report.

Paul Gross, Mary Gannotti, Amy Bailes, Susan D Horn, Jacob Kean, Unni G Narayanan, Jerry Oakes, Garey Noritz, Cerebral Palsy Research Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul GrossDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Mary GannottiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut.
Amy BailesDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Susan D HornDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jacob KeanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Unni G NarayananDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jerry OakesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
Garey NoritzDepartment of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Cerebral Palsy Research Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo apply practice-based evidence to clinical management of cerebral palsy (CP). The process of establishing purpose, structure, logistics, and elements of a multi-institutional registry and the baseline characteristics of initial enrollees are reported.

designA consensus-building process among consumers, clinicians, and researchers used a participatory action process.

settingCommunity, hospitals, and universities.

participantsMore than 100 clinicians, researchers, and consumers and more than 1858 enrollees in the registry.

main outcome measuresNot applicable.

resultsConsensus was that the purpose of registry was to (1) quantify practice variation, (2) facilitate quality improvement (QI), and (3) perform comparative effectiveness research (CER). Collecting data during routine clinical care using the electronic medical record was determined to be a sustainable plan for data acquisition and management. Clinicians from multiple disciplines defined salient characteristics of individuals and interventions for the registry elements. The registry was central to the clinical research network, and a leadership structure was created. A leading electronic health record platform adopted the registry elements. Twenty-four sites have initiated the data collection process and agreed to export data to the registry. Currently 12 are collecting data. Number of enrollees and characteristics were similar to other population registers.

conclusionsThis is the first multi-institutional CP registry that contains the patient and treatment characteristics needed for QI and CER. The Cerebral Palsy Research Network registry elements are implemented in a versatile electronic platform and minimize burden to clinicians. The resultant registry is available for any institution to participate and is growing rapidly.

Indexed as

CDE, common data elementCER, comparative effectiveness researchCerebral palsyComparative effectiveness researchCP, cerebral palsyCPRN, Cerebral Palsy Research NetworkEHR, electronic health recordGMFCS, Gross Motor Function Classification SystemHCRN, Hydrocephalus Clinical Research NetworkIRB, Institutional Review BoardLFEP, Learn from Every PatientNCH, Nationwide Children’s HospitalNINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeOT, occupational therapyPT, physical therapyQI, quality improvementQuality improvementREDCap, Research Electronic Data CaptureregistriesRehabilitationSLP, speech language pathologyVON, Vermont Oxford Network

Identifiers

PMID33543081
PMCPMC7853390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.