Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543079›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2020

Lessons Learned: The Difficulties of Incorporating Intensity Principles Into Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation.

Mark G Bowden, Eric D Monsch, Addie Middleton, Chris Daughtry, Troy Powell, Sara V Kraft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of transsectoral long-term neurorehabilitation.Neurological research and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark G BowdenDivision of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Eric D MonschDivision of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Addie MiddletonDivision of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Chris DaughtryAnMed Health Rehabilitation Hospital, Anderson, SC.
Troy PowellHealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital, Charleston, SC.
Sara V KraftDivision of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Funding

Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086844NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of a rehabilitation approach focusing on cardiovascular, strength, and gait training intensity in the inpatient rehabilitation setting after a new onset of stroke. We additionally aimed to determine the efficacy of this intensity-based program on rehabilitation outcomes compared with usual care.

designParticipants were pseudo-randomized to an intensity-based program focusing on gait, cardiovascular, and strength training or to usual care. Outcomes included FIM, 10-meter walk, 2-minute walk, timed Up and Go test, 5-time sit-to-stand test, and Tinetti balance assessment.

interventionThe intervention consisted of 6 20-minute sessions per week dedicated to intensity of activity: 2 each for walking, cardiovascular training, and strength training.

participantsPatients (N=49) with new onset stroke admitted to inpatient rehabilitation over the course of 1 year.

settingFour inpatient rehabilitation facilities with comprehensive neurologic rehabilitation teams.

resultsThirty-five individuals (16 intervention, 19 controls) completed all testing. Subject compliance to the intensity intervention demonstrated completion of approximately half the prescribed sessions. All outcomes improved significantly from admission to discharge, and a significant interaction between treatment group and time was observed for the 2-minute walk and the Tinetti balance assessment. The 2-minute walk, Tinetti balance assessment, 10-meter walk, and FIM demonstrated between-group effect sizes greater than 0.60 in favor of the intervention group.

conclusionsThe intensity-based protocol was safe, and several measures demonstrated efficacy when compared with usual care. Results may have been limited by poor program compliance, showing a need to identify and ameliorate obstacles to integration of comprehensive intensity-based programs addressing endurance, strength, and gait training. Applying physiological principles of exercise to acute stroke rehabilitation demonstrates great promise for improving independent physical function.

Indexed as

10-mw, 10-meter walk test2MWT, 2-minute walk test5xSTS, 5 times sit to standCFIR, Consolidated Framework for Implementation ResearchExerciseRehabilitationSSWS, self-selected walking speedStrokeWalking

Identifiers

PMID33543079
PMCPMC7853341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.