Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33543060›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2020

Winter Mobility and Community Participation Among People Who Use Mobility Devices: A Scoping Review.

Jacquie Ripat, Kathryn M Sibley, Ed Giesbrecht, Brittany Curtis, Alexie Touchette, Jaimie Borisoff, Karen Ethans, Yue Li, Ernesto Morales

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Wheeled Mobility Use on Accessible Fixed-Route Transit: A Field Study in Environmental Docility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jacquie RipatDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Kathryn M SibleyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Ed GiesbrechtDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Brittany CurtisDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Alexie TouchetteDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Jaimie BorisoffRehabilitation Engineering Design Laboratory, British Columbia Institute of Technology, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Karen EthansDepartment of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Yue LiKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ernesto MoralesDepartment of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CAGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the knowledge, products, and strategies for individuals with mobility-related disabilities used to address challenging winter conditions. DATA SOURCES: AgeLine, OVID, Scopus, and CIHAHL were searched for studies that met the inclusion criteria, from inception to April 2018. Sources for gray literature, or information outside commercial publishing, included ProQUEST, government websites, and manufacturers, vendors, and consumer organization websites. SOURCE SELECTION: Population of people with limited or reduced mobility or mobility device users involved in winter-related environmental conditions; aim was to increase activity, participation, or safety. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select eligible sources. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from each source. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three published peer-reviewed papers were located. Study populations were predominantly those who used wheelchairs (mixed wheelchair type, n=7; power, n=4; manual, n=2), canes (n=3), or specialized winter footwear (n=2). The primary focus of these papers was determined to be tool or device (n=10), recommendations (n=9), strategy (n=2), or resource (n=2). Civic policy documents were variable in citizen responsibility for snow clearing. Limited winter-related supports were identified on consumer organization websites. Although some winter-specific products exist, very few studies have examined the effectiveness of any of these products.

conclusionsDespite the common experience of challenging winter conditions, a paucity of winter-specific research and innovation relevant for individuals who use mobility devices exists. Researchers, consumers, and industry need to partner to develop novel tools, strategies, resources, and evidence-based recommendations.

Indexed as

Cold climateCommunity participationICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthRehabilitationSelf-help devicesWheelchairs

Identifiers

PMID33543060
PMCPMC7853381
OpenAlexW2983886535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.