Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542984›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society

The prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Tariq Almudhaiyan, Albanderi Alhamzah, Mozon AlShareef, Ahmed Alrasheed, Rabia Jaffar, Adel Alluhidan, Mohammed Al-Hazazi, Tariq Aldebasi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Factors contributing to spectacle intolerance: Insights from a multicenter study in Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tariq AlmudhaiyanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Albanderi AlhamzahKing Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mozon AlShareefKing Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AlrasheedKing Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rabia JaffarDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Adel AlluhidanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Al-HazaziDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tariq AldebasiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
National Guard Health Affairs · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted targeting healthy Saudi adults (20-40 years old) at two major gatherings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from December 2018 to January 2019. Refractive errors were measured, and data pertaining to age, sex, region of origin, and spectacle use was collected. Clinically significant myopia was defined as SE ≥ -0.50 D, hyperopia as SE ≥ 0.50D, and astigmatism as cylindrical error ≥ 0.50D. Refractive error measurements were assessed using Topcon's Auto-Kerato-Refractometer, KR-800.

resultsA total of 660 adult individuals (1,319 eyes) were included in this study, of which 321 participants (48.7%) were found to be myopes, 167 subjects (25.2%) were hyperopes, and 438 individuals (66.3%) had astigmatism. With regards to correlations, myopia was highly correlated with being male (

conclusionIn this study, the refractive error with the highest prevalence among Saudis was astigmatism, followed by myopia and hyperopia. Gender, region of origin, and spectacle wear were all observed to be highly correlated with higher rates of refractive error.

Indexed as

Astigmatismauto-kerato-refractometerhyperopiamyopiarefractive errors

Identifiers

PMID33542984
PMCPMC7849861
OpenAlexW3020144645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.