ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020
Evaluating Heterogeneity of Primary Lung Tumor Using Clinical Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Tumor Heterogeneity Index.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo improve the assessment of primary tumor heterogeneity in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we proposed a method using basic measurements from T1- and T2-weighted MRI.
methodsOne hundred and four NSCLC patients with different T stages were studied. Fifty-two patients were analyzed as training group and another 52 as testing group. The ratios of standard deviation (SD)/mean signal value of primary tumor from T1-weighted (T1WI), T1-enhanced (T1C), T2-weighted (T2WI), and T2 fat suppression (T2fs) images were calculated. In the training group, correlation analyses were performed between the ratios and T stages. Then an ordinal regression model was built to generate the tumor heterogeneous index (THI) for evaluating the heterogeneity of tumor. The model was validated in the testing group.
resultsThere were 11, 32, 40, and 21 patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 disease, respectively. In the training group, the median SD/mean on T1WI, T1C, T2WI, and T2fs sequences was 0.11, 0.19, 0.16, and 0.15 respectively. The SD/mean on T1C (p=0.003), T2WI (p=0.000), and T2fs sequences (p=0.002) correlated significantly with T stages. Patients with more advanced T stage showed higher SD/mean on T2-weighted, T2fs, and T1C sequences. The median THI in the training group was 2.15. THI correlated with T stage significantly (p=0.000). In the testing group, THI was also significantly related to T stages (p=0.001). Higher THI had relevance to more advanced T stage.
conclusionsThe proposed ratio measurements and THI based on MRI can serve as functional radiomic markers that correlated with T stages for evaluating heterogeneity of lung tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.