Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542705›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2020

Practical Clinical and Diagnostic Pathway for the Investigation of the Infertile Couple.

Andrea Garolla, Damiano Pizzol, Andrea Roberto Carosso, Andrea Borini, Filippo Maria Ubaldi, Aldo Eugenio Calogero, Alberto Ferlin, Antonio Lanzone, Francesco Tomei, Bruno Engl and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Human Infertility and Reproductive Endocrinology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Andrea GarollaSection of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Male Gamete Cryopreservation, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Damiano PizzolSection of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Male Gamete Cryopreservation, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Andrea Roberto CarossoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, S. Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Andrea Borini9.baby, Family and Fertility Center, Tecnobios Procreazione, Bologna, Italy.
Filippo Maria UbaldiGENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
Aldo Eugenio CalogeroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Alberto FerlinDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Antonio LanzoneDepartment of Woman's Health Sciences of the Child and Public Health, Unit of Obstetrics Pathology, University Clinic Foundation "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco TomeiAssisted Reproductive Unit, Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.
Bruno EnglDonna Salus, Center for Women's Health and Fertility, Bolzano, Italy.
Laura RienziGENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
Lucia De SantisIVF Unit, Gynaecological-Obstetric Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni Coticchio9.baby, Family and Fertility Center, Tecnobios Procreazione, Bologna, Italy.
Lee SmithThe Cambridge Centre for Sport & Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rossella CannarellaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Attilio AnastasiCenter for Physiopathology of Human Reproduction, Delta Hospital, Lagosanto, Italy.
Massimo MenegazzoSection of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Male Gamete Cryopreservation, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Liborio StuppiaDepartment of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
Christian CorsiniSection of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Male Gamete Cryopreservation, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Carlo ForestaSection of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Male Gamete Cryopreservation, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capsule: This expert opinion summarizes current knowledge on risk factors for infertility and identifies a practical clinical and diagnostic approach for the male and female partners of an infertile couple aimed to improve the investigation and management of fertility problems. Background: Infertility represents an important and growing health problem affecting up to 16% of couples worldwide. In most cases, male, female, or combined factor can be identified, and different causes or risk factors have been related to this condition. However, there are no standardized guidelines on the clinical-diagnostic approach of infertile couples and the recommendations concerning infertility are sometimes lacking, incomplete, or problematic to apply. Objective: The aim of this work is to provide an appropriate clinical and diagnostic pathway for infertile couples designed by a multidisciplinary-team of experts. The rationale is based on the history and physical examination and then oriented on the basis of initial investigations. This approach could be applied in order to reduce variation in practice and to improve the investigation and management of fertility problems. Methods: Prominent Italian experts of the main specialties committed in the ART procedures, including gynecologists, andrologists, embryologists, biologists, geneticists, oncologists, and microbiologists, called "InfertilItaly group", used available evidence to develop this expert position. Outcomes: Starting from the individuation of the principal risk factors that may influence the fertility of females and males and both genders, the work group identified most appropriate procedures using a gradual approach to both partners aimed to obtain a precise diagnosis and the most effective therapeutic option, reducing invasive and occasionally redundant procedures. Conclusions: This expert position provides current knowledge on risk factors and suggests a diagnostic workflow of infertile couples. By using this step-by-step approach, health care workers involved in ART, may individuate a practical clinical management of infertile couples shared by experts.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleInfertility, MaleMalePractice Guidelines as TopicRisk Factorsassisted reproductive technlogycouple infertilitydiagnosisfemale infertilityinfertility diagnosismale infertilitymanagementreproduction

Identifiers

PMID33542705
PMCPMC7851076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.