Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542649›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021

The Clinical Value of the RA-Adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in the Fracture Risk Prediction of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China.

Ling Hu, Ting Li, Yi Zou, Xiao-Ling Yin, Hui Gan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fracture risk assessment in diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ling Hu *Department of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, People's Republic of China.
Ting Li *Department of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, People's Republic of China.
Yi ZouDepartment of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Ling YinDepartment of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, People's Republic of China.
Hui GanDepartment of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, People's Republic of China.
Nanchang University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNThird Hospital of Nanchang · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the clinical value of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in the fracture risk prediction of Chinese patients after replacing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the FRAX algorithm.

methodsA total of 1,047 patients with T2DM from the Endocrinology Department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were enrolled in this study. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was then used to detect their bone density. RA in the FRAX algorithm was replaced with T2DM, and the new RA-adjusted FRAX was used to assess the fracture risk of the patients.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index of the RA-adjusted FRAX to the treatment opinions on T2DM-associated hip fractures were 0.4761, 0.9642, and 0.4403, respectively, while the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index of RA-adjusted FRAX to the treatment opinions on T2DM-associated major bone osteoporotic fractures were 0.0080, 1.0000, 0.0080, respectively. The DXA and RA-adjusted FRAX both showed acceptable consistency in the treatment recommendations for hip fractures in patients with T2DM (κ = 0.49) but had poor consistency in treatment recommendations for major bone osteoporotic fractures (κ = 0.010). The body mass index (BMI) scores, femoral neck-bone mineral densities, and number of males in the same treatment opinion group were significantly higher than in the different treatment opinions group (

conclusionRA-adjusted FRAX is a useful clinical tool for evaluation of hip fracture risk for Chinese patients with T2DM, and the accuracy of fracture risk prediction for male patients with T2DM and patients with T2DM with high BMI scores or high femoral neck-bone mineral density is higher.

Indexed as

bone mineral densityfracture riskFRAXosteoporosistype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID33542649
PMCPMC7853630
OpenAlexW3123163137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.