Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542538›Full record

ArticleBiomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia2022

Is ultra low-dose CT with tin filtration useful for examination of SI joints? Can it replace X-ray in diagnostics of sacroiliitis?

Eva Korcakova, Jana Stepankova, David Suchy, Petr Hosek, Kristyna Bajcurova, Jan Pernicky, Hynek Mirka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Axial Imaging in Spondyloarthritis.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva KorcakovaDepartment of Imaging methods, University hospital in Plzen, Czech Republic.
Jana StepankovaDivision of Medical physics, University hospital in Plzen, Czech Republic.
David SuchyClinical Rheumatology, University hospital in Plzen, Czech Republic.
Petr HosekBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic.
Kristyna BajcurovaDepartment of Imaging methods, University hospital in Plzen, Czech Republic.
Jan PernickyDepartment of Imaging methods, University hospital in Plzen, Czech Republic.
Hynek MirkaDepartment of Imaging methods, University hospital in Plzen, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe first objective of our study was to determine the radiation exposure received by patients during tin-filtrated ultra-low-dose computed tomography (TFULDCT) of sacroiliac joints and to compare those to conventional X-ray doses. For comparison, we added a cohort examined by low-dose CT (LDCT) without tin filtration. The second objective was to compare the results of TFULDCT and X-ray in the detection of sacroiliitis.

methodsOur retrospective study covered 45 patients, who were examined for suspected axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). The first group underwent TFULDCT as well as conventional radiography (CR); the second group underwent LDCT only without tin filtration. Effective doses of TFULDCT, LDCT and CR were calculated by an experienced medical physicist. TFULDCT and CR were independently evaluated by three investigators, who decided on the presence or absence of rheumatoid inflammatory bone changes. The results were statistically evaluated.

resultsIn our cohort, the median effective dose for TFULDCT was 0.11 mSv, range (0.06-0.40 mSv), for LDCT 0.5 mSv (0.29-0.89 mSv), and for CR 0.25 mSv (0.06-1.87 mSv). We proved that TFULDCT produces a significantly lower percentage of uncertain results (23.3%; 95% CI: 11.3-41.6%) than CR (66.7%; 95% CI: 48.3-81.1%).

conclusionsTin filtration helps to reduce CT radiation exposure to values lower than those resulting from CR. TFULDCT offers better overall diagnostic performance than CR. Our results prove that TFULDCT can replace CR in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in the radiographical stage of AxSpA.

Indexed as

SacroiliitisTinHumansRadiation DosageRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-RaysTinaxial spondyloarthritiscomputed tomographyradiationsacroiliitistin filtration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.