Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542483›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health policy2021

Men's Sheds in Scotland: the potential for improving the health of men.

Danielle Kelly, Simon Teasdale, Artur Steiner, Helen Mason

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle KellyYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, M201 George Moore Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Simon TeasdaleYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, M201 George Moore Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Artur SteinerYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, M201 George Moore Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK. Artur.steiner@gcu.ac.uk.
Helen MasonYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, M201 George Moore Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L003287/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent policy focus is on the 'non-obvious' role of community-based organisations in tackling causes of poor health, such as social exclusion. Men's Sheds are a type of community-based organisation offering health and wellbeing benefits to men, despite this not being the explicit reason they exist. A qualitative study was conducted in Scotland to identify sustainability challenges that impact on the ability of Sheds to become a formal healthcare service. Findings showed that a reliance on ageing and retired volunteers to undertake operational tasks and generate income to fund activities affected the ability of Sheds to sustain and develop. Further, members preferred their Sheds to remain informal and flexible to fit their specific needs. Although Sheds are recognised for their health and wellbeing benefits to men, policymakers must recognise that formalising their activities might detract from the Shed's primary aims. This paper summarises specific policy implications and recommendations, taking into consideration tensions between the expectations placed on Sheds to expand into formal healthcare delivery, and the needs of Shed users. HIGHLIGHTS: Men's Shed are known for their ability to contribute to men's health and wellbeing. The potential of Shed to take on a formal healthcare role is questionable because of a reliance on ageing and retired volunteers and a preference to remain informal. Policymakers must recognise that although Sheds might be well placed to offer formal health care this may detract from their primary aims.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMen's HealthDelivery of Health CareHumansMaleQualitative ResearchScotlandHealthMen’s ShedPublic health

Identifiers

PMID33542483
PMCPMC8192322
OpenAlexW3127412234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.