Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542370›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Metabolic profiling of historical and modern wheat cultivars using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Rachana Poudel, Fatema Bhinderwala, Martha Morton, Robert Powers, Devin J Rose

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachana PoudelDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1901 North 21st Street, Lincoln, NE, 68588-6205, USA.
Fatema BhinderwalaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0304, USA.
Martha MortonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0304, USA.
Robert PowersDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0304, USA.
Devin J RoseDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1901 North 21st Street, Lincoln, NE, 68588-6205, USA. drose3@unl.edu.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Targeted mass spectrometry approaches to understand CART processing and recepter interactionsP20GM113126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI RAZAVI RIZI, MOHAMMAD · 2016 to 2025
$20.8M
Redox Biology CenterP30GM103335 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BECKER, DONALD F · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH FACILITIES CONSTRUCTIONC06RR015468 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI PAUL, PREM S · 2000 to 2000
$2.0M
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015468NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113126NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine changes in the grain components between historical and modern wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars, wholemeal flours from 19 wheat cultivars and 2 landraces released or introduced between 1870 and 2013 and grown over two crop years were extracted using hydroalcoholic solution and analyzed using one dimensional

Indexed as

Coumaric AcidsEdible GrainFlourHistory, AncientHumansHydroxybenzoatesMetabolomePlant BreedingProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyTriticumCoumaric Acidsferulic acidHydroxybenzoatesphenolic acid

Identifiers

PMID33542370
PMCPMC7862595
OpenAlexW3128611682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.