Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542313›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

County-level longitudinal clustering of COVID-19 mortality to incidence ratio in the United States.

Nasim Vahabi, Masoud Salehi, Julio D Duarte, Abolfazl Mollalo, George Michailidis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Estimates from 31 countries show the significant impact of COVID-19 excess mortality on the incidence of family bereavement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Long-term exposure to PMEnvironment international · 2022
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. New confinement index and new perspective for comparing countries - COVID-19.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Spatial Modeling of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nasim Vahabi *Informatics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Masoud Salehi *Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9485-8371
Julio D DuarteCenter for Pharmacogenomics, Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Abolfazl MollaloDepartment of Public Health and Prevention Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Baldwin Wallace University, Berea, OH, USA.
George MichailidisInformatics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. gmichail@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USBaldwin Wallace University · USIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of November 12, 2020, the mortality to incidence ratio (MIR) of COVID-19 was 5.8% in the US. A longitudinal model-based clustering system on the disease trajectories over time was used to identify "vulnerable" clusters of counties that would benefit from allocating additional resources by federal, state and county policymakers. County-level COVID-19 cases and deaths, together with a set of potential risk factors were collected for 3050 U.S. counties during the 1st wave of COVID-19 (Mar25-Jun3, 2020), followed by similar data for 1344 counties (in the "sunbelt" region of the country) during the 2nd wave (Jun4-Sep2, 2020), and finally for 1055 counties located broadly in the great plains region of the country during the 3rd wave (Sep3-Nov12, 2020). We used growth mixture models to identify clusters of counties exhibiting similar COVID-19 MIR growth trajectories and risk-factors over time. The analysis identifies "more vulnerable" clusters during the 1st, 2nd and 3rd waves of COVID-19. Further, tuberculosis (OR 1.3-2.1-3.2), drug use disorder (OR 1.1), hepatitis (OR 13.1), HIV/AIDS (OR 2.3), cardiomyopathy and myocarditis (OR 1.3), diabetes (OR 1.2), mesothelioma (OR 9.3) were significantly associated with increased odds of being in a more vulnerable cluster. Heart complications and cancer were the main risk factors increasing the COVID-19 MIR (range 0.08-0.52% MIR↑). We identified "more vulnerable" county-clusters exhibiting the highest COVID-19 MIR trajectories, indicating that enhancing the capacity and access to healthcare resources would be key to successfully manage COVID-19 in these clusters. These findings provide insights for public health policymakers on the groups of people and locations they need to pay particular attention while managing the COVID-19 epidemic.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisComorbidityCOVID-19FemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePandemicsRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33542313
PMCPMC7862666
OpenAlexW3128577698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.