Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542301›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Integrative analysis of DNA, macroscopic remains and stable isotopes of dog coprolites to reconstruct community diet.

Kelsey E Witt, Karthik Yarlagadda, Julie M Allen, Alyssa C Bader, Mary L Simon, Steven R Kuehn, Kelly S Swanson, Tzu-Wen L Cross, Kristin M Hedman, Stanley H Ambrose and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ethics and applications of isotope analysis in archaeology.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelsey E WittProgram in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA. kelsey_witt_dillon@brown.edu.
Karthik YarlagaddaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Julie M AllenBiology Department, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
Alyssa C BaderDepartment of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Mary L SimonIllinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Steven R KuehnIllinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Kelly S SwansonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Tzu-Wen L CrossDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Kristin M HedmanIllinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Stanley H AmbroseProgram in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Ripan S MalhiProgram in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USIllinois Archaeological Survey · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Characterizing modes of natural selection via diverse ancient and modern samplesR35GM128946 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Emilia Huerta-Sanchez · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paleofeces or coprolites are often used to reconstruct diet at archaeological sites, usually using macroscopic analyses or targeted DNA amplification and sequencing. Here we present an integrative analysis of dog coprolites, combining macroscopic analyses, stable isotope measurements, and DNA shotgun sequencing to examine diet and health status. Dog coprolites used in this study were recovered from the Janey B. Goode and East Saint Louis archaeological sites, both of which are located in the American Bottom, an extensive Mississippi River floodplain in Southwestern Illinois. Based on the context of recovery, coprolites are assigned to the Late Woodland and Terminal Late Woodland periods (ca. 600-1050 AD). Given the scarcity of human remains from this time period, these dog coprolites can be useful as a proxy for understanding human diet during the Late Woodland period. We find that the Late Woodland dogs consumed a variety of fish as well as bird and plant taxa, possibly including maize, and also harbored intestinal parasites and pathogenic bacteria. By sequencing the fecal microbiome of the coprolites, we find some similarities to modern dog microbiomes, as well as specific taxa that can be used to discriminate between modern and ancient microbiomes, excluding soil contaminants. As dogs are often used as a surrogate to assess human diet, humans living with these dogs likely had a similar diet and were affected by similar parasites. These analyses, when integrated, show a more comprehensive view of ancient dog and human diet and health in the region during the initial expansion of maize agriculture than any individual method could alone.

Indexed as

FecesAnimalsArchaeologyBirdsDiet, PaleolithicDNA, AncientDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDogsFishesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHistory, MedievalHumansIllinoisNematodaPlantsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID33542301
PMCPMC7862676
OpenAlexW3127437276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.