Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542271›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Discovery of novel chemical reactions by deep generative recurrent neural network.

William Bort, Igor I Baskin, Timur Gimadiev, Artem Mukanov, Ramil Nugmanov, Pavel Sidorov, Gilles Marcou, Dragos Horvath, Olga Klimchuk, Timur Madzhidov and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Digitizing chemical discovery with a Bayesian explorer for interpreting reactivity data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. SelenzymeRF: updated enzyme suggestion software for unbalanced biochemical reactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

William BortLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 1, rue Blaise Pascal, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Igor I BaskinLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 1, rue Blaise Pascal, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Timur GimadievInstitute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, Kita 21 Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Artem MukanovLaboratory of Chemoinformatics and Molecular Modeling, Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya str. 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia.
Ramil NugmanovLaboratory of Chemoinformatics and Molecular Modeling, Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya str. 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia.
Pavel SidorovInstitute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, Kita 21 Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Gilles MarcouLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 1, rue Blaise Pascal, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Dragos HorvathLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 1, rue Blaise Pascal, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Olga KlimchukLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 1, rue Blaise Pascal, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Timur MadzhidovLaboratory of Chemoinformatics and Molecular Modeling, Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya str. 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia.
Alexandre VarnekLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 1, rue Blaise Pascal, 67000, Strasbourg, France. varnek@unistra.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "creativity" of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in terms of generating de novo molecular structures opened a novel paradigm in compound design, weaknesses (stability & feasibility issues of such structures) notwithstanding. Here we show that "creative" AI may be as successfully taught to enumerate novel chemical reactions that are stoichiometrically coherent. Furthermore, when coupled to reaction space cartography, de novo reaction design may be focused on the desired reaction class. A sequence-to-sequence autoencoder with bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory layers was trained on on-purpose developed "SMILES/CGR" strings, encoding reactions of the USPTO database. The autoencoder latent space was visualized on a generative topographic map. Novel latent space points were sampled around a map area populated by Suzuki reactions and decoded to corresponding reactions. These can be critically analyzed by the expert, cleaned of irrelevant functional groups and eventually experimentally attempted, herewith enlarging the synthetic purpose of popular synthetic pathways.

Identifiers

PMID33542271
PMCPMC7862614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.