ArticleScientific reports2021
Mechanisms for mutual support in motor interactions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Representing relations between individual contributions: when does joint action planning facilitate task performance?Psychological research · 2026Article
- The Role of Different Thoughts in Tacit Coordination and Its Malleability by Interventions.Journal of cognition · 2026Article
- Dynamic neural processing of self-other synchronization error in interpersonal coordination.iScience · 2025Article
- Sharing errors with human and non-human agents.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Dopaminergic modulation of behavioral and electrocortical markers of interpersonal performance monitoring in Parkinson's Disease.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Distinct and content-specific neural representations of self- and other-produced actions in joint piano performance.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Self-other distinction modulates the sense of self-agency during joint actions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The role of dorsal premotor cortex in joint action inhibition.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Visuo-motor interference is modulated by task interactivity: A kinematic study.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- The dopaminergic system supports flexible and rewarding dyadic motor interactive behaviour in Parkinson's Disease.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023Article
- Regulating mirroring of emotions: A social-specific mechanism?Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
What is the key to successful interaction? Is it sufficient to represent a common goal, or does the way our partner achieves that goal count as well? How do we react when our partner misbehaves? We used a turn-taking music-like task requiring participants to play sequences of notes together with a partner, and we investigated how people adapt to a partner's error that violates their expectations. Errors consisted of either playing a wrong note of a sequence that the agents were playing together (thus preventing the achievement of the joint goal) or playing the expected note with an unexpected action. In both cases, we found post-error slowing and inaccuracy suggesting the participants' implicit tendency to correct the partner's error and produce the action that the partner should have done. We argue that these "joint" monitoring processes depend on the motor predictions made within a (dyadic) motor plan and may represent a basic mechanism for mutual support in motor interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.