Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542210›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.

Robin M Tinghitella, E Dale Broder, James H Gallagher, Aaron W Wikle, David M Zonana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evolution of neural circuits in the origin of behavioral novelty.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The persistence and evolutionary consequences of vestigial behaviours.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  12. A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  13. Machine learning reveals singing rhythms of male Pacific field crickets are clock controlled.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robin M Tinghitella *Department of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA. robin.tinghitella@du.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0049-5539
E Dale Broder *Department of Biology, St Ambrose University, Davenport, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-1930
James H GallagherDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-1325
Aaron W WikleDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8871-7000
David M ZonanaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1599-8913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadvertent cues can be refined into signals through coevolution between signalers and receivers, yet the earliest steps in this process remain elusive. In Hawaiian populations of the Pacific field cricket, a new morph producing a novel and incredibly variable song (purring) has spread across islands. Here we characterize the current sexual and natural selection landscape acting on the novel signal by (1) determining fitness advantages of purring through attraction to mates and protection from a prominent deadly natural enemy, and (2) testing alternative hypotheses about the strength and form of selection acting on the novel signal. In field studies, female crickets respond positively to purrs, but eavesdropping parasitoid flies do not, suggesting purring may allow private communication among crickets. Contrary to the sensory bias and preference for novelty hypotheses, preference functions (selective pressure) are nearly flat, driven by extreme inter-individual variation in function shape. Our study offers a rare empirical test of the roles of natural and sexual selection in the earliest stages of signal evolution.

Indexed as

AnimalsDipteraFemaleGenetic FitnessGryllidaeHawaiiMaleMating Preference, AnimalSelection, GeneticVocalization, AnimalWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID33542210
PMCPMC7862365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.