Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542199›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2021

Metabolomics reveals biomarkers of opioid use disorder.

Reza Ghanbari, Yuanyuan Li, Wimal Pathmasiri, Susan McRitchie, Arash Etemadi, Jonathan D Pollock, Hossein Poustchi, Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar, Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili, Gholamreza Roshandel and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emerging technologies and their impact on regulatory science.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Reza Ghanbari *Department of Nutrition, Nutrition Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3876-7584
Yuanyuan Li *Department of Nutrition, Nutrition Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Wimal PathmasiriDepartment of Nutrition, Nutrition Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-5744
Susan McRitchieDepartment of Nutrition, Nutrition Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Arash EtemadiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jonathan D PollockGenetics, Epigenetics, and Developmental Neuroscience Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Hossein PoustchiDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Afarin Rahimi-MovagharIranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Masoumeh Amin-EsmaeiliIranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Gholamreza RoshandelGolestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5494-0722
Amaneh ShayanradDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Behrouz AbaeiDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Reza MalekzadehDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran. dr.reza.malekzadeh@gmail.com.
Susan C J SumnerDepartment of Nutrition, Nutrition Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Susan_sumner@unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3381-6084
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Tehran · IRGolestan University · IRJohns Hopkins University · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer StudiesZIACP000185 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ABNET, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2025
$25.6M
RTI's Regional Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource CenterU24DK097193 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUMNER, SUSAN J · 2012 to 2017
$9.8M
Untargeted Analysis Research ResourceU2CES026544 · NIEHS · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI FENNELL, TIMOTHY RAYMOND · 2015 to 2018
$3.7M
Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C20/A5860NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097193NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026544Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (TUMS) 81/15TUMS | Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (PSRC, TUMS) 81/15U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) U2CES026544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is diagnosed using the qualitative criteria defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Diagnostic biomarkers for OUD do not currently exist. Our study focused on developing objective biological markers to differentiate chronic opiate users with OUD from chronic opiate users without OUD. Using biospecimens from the Golestan Cohort Study, we compared the metabolomics profiles of high opium users who were diagnosed as OUD positive with high opium users who were diagnosed as OUD negative. High opium use was defined as maximum weekly opium usage greater than or equal to the median usage (2.4 g per week), and OUD was defined as having 2 or more DSM-5 criteria in any 12-month period. Among the 218 high opium users in this study, 80 were diagnosed as OUD negative, while 138 were diagnosed as OUD positive. Seven hundred and twelve peaks differentiated high opium users diagnosed as OUD positive from high opium users diagnosed as OUD negative. Stepwise logistic regression modeling of subject characteristics data together with the 712 differentiating peaks revealed a signature that is 95% predictive of an OUD positive diagnosis, a significant (p < 0.0001) improvement over a 63% accurate prediction based on subject characteristic data for these samples. These results suggest that a metabolic profile can be used to predict an OUD positive diagnosis.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBiomarkersCohort StudiesHumansMetabolomicsAnalgesics, OpioidBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33542199
PMCPMC7862627
OpenAlexW3128184686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.