ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Freehand, Static, and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Pooled it
- Agreement and reproducibility of intraoral scan- versus CBCT-based three-dimensional implant position assessment in the posterior mandible - a paired in vitro method-comparison study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Exploring dental implant placement by dental students using freehand, static guide, and dynamic navigation: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Accuracy of robot-assisted implant surgery versus freehand placement: a retrospective clinical study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Accuracy evaluation of robot-guided laser osteotomy for dental implant bed preparation - a digital high-tech procedure.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Implant Guided Surgery in Fully Edentulous Patients: Prediction vs. Actual Outcome-Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study.Head & face medicine · 2024Article
- Digital registration versus cone-beam computed tomography for evaluating implant position: a prospective cohort study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement with Dynamic Navigation-Investigation of the Influence of Two Different Optical Reference Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Full-Arch Guided Restoration and Bone Regeneration: A Complete Digital Workflow Case Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Proposal and Validation of a New Nonradiological Method for Postoperative Three-Dimensional Implant Position Analysis Based on the Dynamic Navigation System: An In Vitro Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Digital versus radiographic accuracy evaluation of guided implant surgery: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Intraoral Scanning as an Alternative to Evaluate the Accuracy of Dental Implant Placements in Partially Edentate Situations: A Prospective Clinical Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- [Accuracy of computer-guided oral implant placement and influencing factors].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022Article
- Influence of Implant Impression Methods, Polymer Materials, and Implant Angulation on the Accuracy of Dental Models.Polymers · 2022Article
- Analytical Modeling of the Interaction of a Four Implant-Supported Overdenture with Bone Tissue.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Optimization of X-ray Investigations in Dentistry Using Optical Coherence Tomography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Assessment of Differences in the Dimensions of Mandible Condyle Models in Fan- versus Cone-Beam Computer Tomography Acquisition.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer aided implantology is the safest way to perform dental implants. The research of high accuracy represents a daily effort. The validated method to assess the accuracy of placed dental implants is the superimposition of a pre-operative and a post-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with planned and placed implants. This procedure is accountable for a biologic cost for the patient. To investigate alternative procedure for accuracy assessment, fifteen resin casts were printed. For each model, six implants were digitally planned and then placed following three different approaches: (a) template guided free hand, (b) static computer aided implantology (SCAI), and (c) dynamic computer aided implantology (DCAI). The placement accuracy of each implant was performed via two methods: the CBCT comparison described above and a matching between implant positions recovered from the original surgical plan with those obtained with a post-operative intraoral scan (IOS). Statistically significant mean differences between guided groups (SCAI and DCAI) and the free hand group were found at all considered deviations, while no differences resulted between the SCAI and DCAI approaches. Moreover, no mean statistically significant differences were found between CBCT and IOS assessment, confirming the validity of this new method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.