Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33542084›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2021

Recanalisation therapies for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants.

David J Seiffge, Thomas Meinel, Jan Christoph Purrucker, Johannes Kaesmacher, Urs Fischer, Duncan Wilson, Teddy Y Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

David J SeiffgeStroke Research Center, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK david.seiffge@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3890-3849
Thomas MeinelDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Berne, Bern, Switzerland.
Jan Christoph PurruckerNeurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2978-4972
Johannes KaesmacherUniversity Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional of Neuroradiology, University Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric RadiologyUniversity Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional of Neuroradiology, University Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-2289
Urs FischerDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Berne, Bern, Switzerland.
Duncan Wilson *Stroke Research Center, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Teddy Y Wu *Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1845-1769
University Hospital of Bern · CHChristchurch Hospital · NZHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as primary therapeutic option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, patients may have ischaemic stroke despite DOAC therapy and there is uncertainty whether those patients can safely receive intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. In this review, we summarise and discuss current knowledge about different approaches to select patient. Time since last DOAC intake-as a surrogate for anticoagulant activity-is easy to use but limited by interindividual variability of drug pharmacokinetics and long cut-offs (>48 hours). Measuring anticoagulant activity using drug-specific coagulation assays showed promising safety results. Large proportion of patients at low anticoagulant activity seem to be potentially treatable but there remains uncertainty about exact safe cut-off values and limited assay availability. The use of specific reversal agents (ie, idarucizumab or andexanet alfa) prior to thrombolysis is a new emerging option with first data reporting safety but issues including health economics need to be elucidated. Mechanical thrombectomy appears to be safe without any specific selection criteria applied. In patients on DOAC therapy with large vessel occlusion, decision for intravenous thrombolysis should not delay thrombectomy (eg, direct thrombectomy or immediate transfer to a thrombectomy-capable centre recommended). Precision medicine using a tailored approach combining clinicoradiological information (ie, penumbra and vessel status), anticoagulant activity and use of specific reversal agents only if necessary seems a reasonable choice.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationHumansIschemic StrokePrecision MedicineAnticoagulantscerebrovascular diseasestroke

Identifiers

PMID33542084
PMCPMC8053326
OpenAlexW3126445210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.