Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33541841›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2021

Evolution of Microbial Genomics: Conceptual Shifts over a Quarter Century.

Eugene V Koonin, Kira S Makarova, Yuri I Wolf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From genome to lifestyle: adaptive strategies ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrated genomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Microbial Evolution and Systematics: Archaea and Bacteria.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Directed evolution of bacteriophages: thwarted by prolific prophage.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Deciphering the enigmatic PilY1 ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Directed evolution of bacteriophages: impacts of prolific prophage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Extremophiles in a changing world.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2024
    Review
  19. A generic approach to infer community-level fitness of microbial genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eugene V KooninNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. Electronic address: koonin@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Kira S MakarovaNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Yuri I WolfNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.

Funding

Comparative Analysis Of Completely Sequenced GenomesZIALM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$43.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM000073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prokaryote genomics started in earnest in 1995, with the complete sequences of two small bacterial genomes, those of Haemophilus influenzae and Mycoplasma genitalium. During the next quarter century, the prokaryote genome database has been growing exponentially, with no saturation in sight. For most of these 25 years, genome sequencing remained limited to cultivable microbes. Together with next-generation sequencing methods, advances in metagenomics and single-cell genomics have lifted this limitation, providing for an increasingly unbiased characterization of the global prokaryote diversity. Advances in computational genomics followed the progress of genome sequencing, even if occasionally lagging behind. Several major new branches of bacteria and archaea were discovered, including Asgard archaea, the apparent closest relatives of eukaryotes and expansive groups of bacteria and archaea with small genomes thought to be symbionts of other prokaryotes. Comparative analysis of numerous prokaryote genomes spanning a wide range of evolutionary distances changed the conceptual foundations of microbiology, supplanting the notion of species genomes with fixed gene sets with that of dynamic pangenomes and the notion of a single Tree of Life (ToL) with a statistical tree-like trend among individual gene trees. Strides were also made towards a theory and quantitative laws of prokaryote genome evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, MicrobialArchaeaBacteriaGenetic VariationGenomicsHumansPhylogenygene gain and lossmetagenomicspangenomephylogenetic treesprokaryote genome evolutionsingle-cell genomics

Identifiers

PMID33541841
PMCPMC9404256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.