ArticleBiology2021
Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods for the detection of anisakid material in different food matrices: A systematic review.Food and waterborne parasitology · 2026Review
- From fish to fork: An analysis of the fishmeal feed chain & presence of Anisakid material.Food and waterborne parasitology · 2026Review
- Food Safety Concerns:Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Invasion dynamics and ecological impacts ofVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Anisakidae and Anisakidosis: A Public Health Perspective.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Anisakis larvae (Nematoda: Anisakidae): retrospective morphological, morphometric, biogeography, and taxonomic status analysis.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2025Article
- Foodborne Parasites and Their Complex Life Cycles Challenging Food Safety in Different Food Chains.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Advantage of Species Diversification to Facilitate Sustainable Development of Aquaculture Sector.Biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsProtein extracts from
resultsOur data demonstrate the presence of Ani s4 allergen in both infected and aquacultured fish extracts, providing a possible interpretation for the allergic manifestations reported by subjects, already sensitized to
conclusionsThe present data stimulate more accurate prophylaxis suggestions for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.