ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2021
How Do Smut Fungi Use Plant Signals to Spatiotemporally Orientate on and
Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative meta-analysis of barely transcriptome: Pathogen type determines host preference.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Teliosporogenesis of the Peanut Smut FungusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level comparative genomics and host-specific fungal transcriptomics uncover adaptive virulence strategies in the sugarcane smut pathogen.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Histopathology ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Uncovering the Mechanisms: The Role of Biotrophic Fungi in Activating or Suppressing Plant Defense Responses.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The response of rhubarb to smut infection is revealed through a comparative transcriptome and metabolome study.Planta · 2023Article
- Transcriptome Comparison between Two Strains ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ethylene Promotes Expression of the Appressorium- and Pathogenicity-Related Genes via GPCR- and MAPK-Dependent Manners inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The barley HvSTP13GR mutant triggers resistance against biotrophic fungi.Molecular plant pathology · 2022Article
- Infection Strategies and Pathogenicity of Biotrophic Plant Fungal Pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Smuts to the Power of Three: Biotechnology, Biotrophy, and Basic Biology.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smut fungi represent a large group of biotrophic plant pathogens that cause extensive yield loss and are also model organisms for studying plant-pathogen interactions. In recent years, they have become biotechnological tools. After initial penetration of the plant epidermis, smut fungi grow intra-and intercellularly without disrupting the plant-plasma membrane. Following the colonialization step, teliospores are formed and later released. While some smuts only invade the tissues around the initial penetration site, others colonize in multiple plant organs resulting in spore formation distal from the original infection site. The intimate contact zone between fungal hyphae and the host is termed the biotrophic interaction zone and enables exchange of signals and nutrient uptake. Obviously, all steps of on and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.