Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33540703›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Collaborative Indoor Positioning Systems: A Systematic Review.

Pavel Pascacio, Sven Casteleyn, Joaquín Torres-Sospedra, Elena Simona Lohan, Jari Nurmi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pavel PascacioInstitute of New Imaging Technologies, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castellón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9206-7496
Sven CasteleynInstitute of New Imaging Technologies, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castellón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0572-5716
Joaquín Torres-SospedraInstitute of New Imaging Technologies, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castellón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4338-4334
Elena Simona LohanElectrical Engineering Unit, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1718-6924
Jari NurmiElectrical Engineering Unit, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2169-4606

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 813278Ramon y Cajal RYC-2014-16606Torres-Quevedo PTQ2018-009981.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research and development in Collaborative Indoor Positioning Systems (CIPSs) is growing steadily due to their potential to improve on the performance of their non-collaborative counterparts. In contrast to the outdoors scenario, where Global Navigation Satellite System is widely adopted, in (collaborative) indoor positioning systems a large variety of technologies, techniques, and methods is being used. Moreover, the diversity of evaluation procedures and scenarios hinders a direct comparison. This paper presents a systematic review that gives a general view of the current CIPSs. A total of 84 works, published between 2006 and 2020, have been identified. These articles were analyzed and classified according to the described system's architecture, infrastructure, technologies, techniques, methods, and evaluation. The results indicate a growing interest in collaborative positioning, and the trend tend to be towards the use of distributed architectures and infrastructure-less systems. Moreover, the most used technologies to determine the collaborative positioning between users are wireless communication technologies (Wi-Fi, Ultra-WideBand, and Bluetooth). The predominant collaborative positioning techniques are Received Signal Strength Indication, Fingerprinting, and Time of Arrival/Flight, and the collaborative methods are particle filters, Belief Propagation, Extended Kalman Filter, and Least Squares. Simulations are used as the main evaluation procedure. On the basis of the analysis and results, several promising future research avenues and gaps in research were identified.

Indexed as

collaborative indoor positioning systemslocation-based servicespositioning methodpositioning techniquepositioning technologysystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID33540703
PMCPMC7867261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.