Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33540699›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Engineering and Assessing Cardiac Tissue Complexity.

Karine Tadevosyan, Olalla Iglesias-García, Manuel M Mazo, Felipe Prósper, Angel Raya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in Cardiac Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Transcriptional Regulation of Cardiac Development and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karine TadevosyanRegenerative Medicine Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL) and Program for Clinical Translation of Regenerative Medicine in Catalonia (P-CMRC), 08908 L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain.
Olalla Iglesias-GarcíaRegenerative Medicine Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL) and Program for Clinical Translation of Regenerative Medicine in Catalonia (P-CMRC), 08908 L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7728-9207
Manuel M MazoRegenerative Medicine Program, Cima Universidad de Navarra, Foundation for Applied Medical Research, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6250-5579
Felipe PrósperRegenerative Medicine Program, Cima Universidad de Navarra, Foundation for Applied Medical Research, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6115-8790
Angel RayaRegenerative Medicine Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL) and Program for Clinical Translation of Regenerative Medicine in Catalonia (P-CMRC), 08908 L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2189-9775

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2017-SGR-899Generalitat de Catalunya CERCA ProgrammeInstituto de Salud Carlos III RD16/0011/0005Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD16/0011/0024Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España RTI2018-095377-B-100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac tissue engineering is very much in a current focus of regenerative medicine research as it represents a promising strategy for cardiac disease modelling, cardiotoxicity testing and cardiovascular repair. Advances in this field over the last two decades have enabled the generation of human engineered cardiac tissue constructs with progressively increased functional capabilities. However, reproducing tissue-like properties is still a pending issue, as constructs generated to date remain immature relative to native adult heart. Moreover, there is a high degree of heterogeneity in the methodologies used to assess the functionality and cardiac maturation state of engineered cardiac tissue constructs, which further complicates the comparison of constructs generated in different ways. Here, we present an overview of the general approaches developed to generate functional cardiac tissues, discussing the different cell sources, biomaterials, and types of engineering strategies utilized to date. Moreover, we discuss the main functional assays used to evaluate the cardiac maturation state of the constructs, both at the cellular and the tissue levels. We trust that researchers interested in developing engineered cardiac tissue constructs will find the information reviewed here useful. Furthermore, we believe that providing a unified framework for comparison will further the development of human engineered cardiac tissue constructs displaying the specific properties best suited for each particular application.

Indexed as

MyocardiumRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringAnimalsHeartHeart DiseasesHumansPluripotent Stem CellsTissue Scaffoldscardiac tissue engineeringcardiomyocyteshuman heartpluripotent stem cellstissue maturation

Identifiers

PMID33540699
PMCPMC7867236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.