Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33540537›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

ECMO in Cardiac Arrest: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Amandine De Charrière, Benjamin Assouline, Marc Scheen, Nathalie Mentha, Carlo Banfi, Karim Bendjelid, Raphaël Giraud

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Direct Cardiac Compression Device for Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Amandine De CharrièreIntensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Benjamin AssoulineIntensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Marc ScheenIntensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2661-3000
Nathalie MenthaFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Carlo BanfiFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1134-2068
Karim BendjelidIntensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7921-7207
Raphaël GiraudIntensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5956-8643
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a frequent cause of death and a major public health issue. To date, conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the only efficient method of resuscitation available that positively impacts prognosis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a complex and costly technique that requires technical expertise. It is not considered standard of care in all hospitals and should be applied only in high-volume facilities. ECMO combined with CPR is known as ECPR (extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and permits hemodynamic and respiratory stabilization of patients with CA refractory to conventional CPR. This technique allows the parallel treatment of the underlying etiology of CA while maintaining organ perfusion. However, current evidence does not support the routine use of ECPR in all patients with refractory CA. Therefore, an appropriate selection of patients who may benefit from this procedure is key. Reducing the duration of low blood flow by means of performing high-quality CPR and promoting access to ECPR, may improve the survival rate of the patients presenting with refractory CA. Indeed, patients who benefit from ECPR seem to carry better neurological outcomes. The aim of this present narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and to clarify its potential therapeutic role, as well as to provide an in-depth explanation of equipment and its set up, the patient selection process, and the patient management post-ECPR.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestECMOECPRextracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID33540537
PMCPMC7867121
OpenAlexW3128124895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.