ArticleMicroorganisms2021
Comparative Study of Eleven Mechanical Pretreatment Protocols for
Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-Analytical Cleanup of Feline Feces Improves DNA Extract Quality, Reduces Post-Extraction PCR Inhibition, and Enhances Molecular Detectability of Intestinal Protozoa.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Fecal DNA Extraction Kits for the Giant Panda (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Molecular characterization and associated risk factors of zoonotic cryptosporidiosis in bovine calves and humans in Menoufia governorate, Egypt.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Multicenter comparative study of Enterocytozoon bieneusi DNA extraction methods from stool samples, and mechanical pretreatment protocols evaluation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The First Identification ofVeterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Rapid on-site nucleic acid testing: On-chip sample preparation, amplification, and detection, and their integration into all-in-one systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Three Real-Time PCR Assays Targeting the SSU rRNA Gene, the COWP Gene and the DnaJ-Like Protein Gene for the Diagnosis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparative Performance of Eight PCR Methods to DetectPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, many commercial kits allow the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.