H

Liping Zeng, Tianyi Xu, Jie Meng, Dingfang Wu, Shihua Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liping ZengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.

Tianyi XuResearch Center of Siyuan Natural Pharmacy and Biotoxicology, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Jie MengResearch Center of Siyuan Natural Pharmacy and Biotoxicology, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Dingfang WuResearch Center of Siyuan Natural Pharmacy and Biotoxicology, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Shihua WuResearch Center of Siyuan Natural Pharmacy and Biotoxicology, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1669-7522

Zhejiang University · CNAnhui Special Equipment Inspection Institute · CNQingdao Agricultural University · CNZhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 21672188National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LY20B020011 and LY16B020004

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counter-current chromatography (CCC) is a unique liquid-liquid partition chromatography and largely relies on the partition interactions of solutes and solvents in two-phase solvents. Usually, the two-phase solvents used in CCC include a lipophilic organic phase and a hydrophilic aqueous phase. Although a large number of partition interactions have been found and used in the CCC separations, there are few studies that address the role of water on solvents and solutes in the two-phase partition. In this study, we presented a new insight that H

Indexed as

Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMass SpectrometryAntineoplastic AgentsChromatography, LiquidHexanesMethanolPyransRubiaSolventsWaterAntineoplastic AgentsHexanesMethanolPyransrubimaillinSolventsWatercounter-current chromatographyhydrophobic interactionsmolluginnatural products isolationRubia cordifoliatraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID33540504

DOI10.3390/molecules26030751

PMCPMC7867130

OpenAlexW3128839421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.