Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33540493›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2021

Real-World Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Patients with Advanced Angiosarcoma who Received Systemic Treatment.

Changhee Park, Miso Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Kyung Chul Moon, Se Hyun Kim, Bhumsuk Keam, Yu Jung Kim, Tae Min Kim, Dong-Wan Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Primary Jejunal Angiosarcoma.ACG case reports journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hepatic Angiosarcoma with Peliosis Hepatis.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Management of Cutaneous Angiosarcoma: an Update Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Changhee ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Miso KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yoonjin KwakDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Chul MoonDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Se Hyun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Bhumsuk KeamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yu Jung KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Tae Min KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dong-Wan KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAngiosarcoma is a highly aggressive mesenchymal tumor. Although systemic chemotherapy is often considered for the inoperable or metastatic angiosarcoma, the outcome of such treatment is unsatisfactory and poorly delineated. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe reviewed electronic medical records of 75 patients with angiosarcoma who were treated with systemic chemotherapy for inoperable or metastatic disease. Patients were classified as having liver involvement if they had either primary or metastatic hepatic lesions.

resultsAmong the patients evaluated, 51 patients (68%) were male and 24 patients (32%) had primary cutaneous angiosarcoma. Liver involvement was present in 28 patients (37.3%). A total of 59 patients received first-line weekly paclitaxel (wPac) and showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 23.7% (n=14), a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0 to 6.1), and a median overall survival (mOS) of 10.2 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 14.6). Among patients without liver involvement, patients receiving wPac (n=35) had significantly prolonged mPFS (5.8 months vs. 3.2 months, respectively; p=0.014) with a tendency for prolonged mOS (13.8 months vs. 11.6 months, respectively; p=0.13) than those receiving other regimens (n=12). A total of 24 patients received second- or later-line pazopanib monotherapy and showed an ORR of 16.7% (n=4), a mPFS of 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.3) and a mOS of 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.5 to not available).

conclusionTreatment with first-line wPac and later-line pazopanib seems to provide survival benefit, especially for patients with advanced angiosarcoma without liver involvement.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemangiosarcomaHumansIndazolesLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPrognosisPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesIndazolesPaclitaxelpazopanibPyrimidinesSulfonamidesAngiosarcomaPaclitaxelPazopanibPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID33540493
PMCPMC8524033
OpenAlexW3127990813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.