ArticleStatistics in medicine2021
Hybrid design evaluating new biomarkers when there is an existing screening test.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Development of cancer screening biomarkers usually follows the Early Detection Research Network 5-Phase guideline in Pepe et al. A key feature of this guide is that the phased development follows a sequential order, moving to the next phase only when the current phase study is complete and has met its target performance. Motivated by a newly funded Newly onset Diabetes cohort study, we propose a design evaluating new biomarkers to discriminate between cases and controls in the presence of an existing screening test. The proposed design achieves two goals: (1) avoiding bias in estimating sensitivity or specificity in predicting cancer at a given time period prior to clinical diagnosis, using data from both screening detected cancers in Phase IV study and clinically diagnosed cancers in Phase III study; and (2) building a panel with biomarkers for Phase III and IV studies based on all data. A simulation study shows that the proposed design outperforms both a conventional method using data in Phase III arm only and a naive method using data in Phase III and IV arms ignoring the difference between the time of screening the detected cancer and the time of clinical diagnosis. The proposed design yields a smaller standard error of the estimation and increases the statistical power to confirm biomarker performance. This proposed method has the potential to shorten the cancer screening biomarker development process, use resources more effectively, and bring benefits to patients quickly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.