Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33540222›Full record

ReviewClinical psychology review2021

Respiratory therapy for the treatment of anxiety: Meta-analytic review and regression.

Teresa M Leyro, Mark V Versella, Min-Jeong Yang, Hannah R Brinkman, Danielle L Hoyt, Paul Lehrer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical psychology review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. My Life in HRV Biofeedback Research.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Teresa M LeyroDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States. Electronic address: tml124@psych.rutgers.edu.
Mark V VersellaDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States.
Min-Jeong YangDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States; Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, United States.
Hannah R BrinkmanDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States.
Danielle L HoytDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States.
Paul LehrerDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Development and Pilot Investigation of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for Smoking CessationR34DA043751 · NIDA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI LEYRO, TERESA MARIA · 2018 to 2020
$698k
Examining the Role of Appraisal and Physiology in Stress-precipitated SmokingR03DA041556 · NIDA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI LEYRO, TERESA MARIA · 2017 to 2017
$116k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA041556NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA043751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRespiratory abnormalities are a hallmark of anxiety symptomatology and may serve as clinically useful modifiers for alleviating anxiety symptoms. However, gold-standard anxiety treatments (e.g., cognitive-behavioral interventions) often do not directly address respiratory components despite their theoretical utility and clinical accessibility. This review examined the clinical effectiveness of respiratory interventions, interventions that directly target respiration abnormalities and processes, in treating trait anxiety symptoms.

methodsThe final analysis included 40 randomized controlled trials including at least one measure of trait anxiety, a respiratory-focused intervention group, and a non-respiratory control-group (active or inactive treatment). Overall effects of respiratory focused interventions were examined, as well as the effect of hypothesized moderators.

resultsRespiratory component interventions yielded significantly greater improvements (moderate to large effect) in anxiety symptoms than controls, with the stronger effects observed in comparison to inactive, rather than active, control conditions. Significant heterogeneity in findings suggests that variability in intervention design, population, and control comparison may obfuscate interpretation of findings.

conclusionsEvidence supports the clinical utility of respiratory interventions as either an independent anxiety treatment, or as an adjunct to other interventions. Clinical and research implications of findings along with recommendations for ongoing investigations in this domain are discussed.

Indexed as

AnxietyBreathingInterventionMeta-analysisRespirationTreatment

Identifiers

PMID33540222
PMCPMC8302658
OpenAlexW3126092337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.