Observational studyChest2021
Ratio of FEV
Observational study in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- New spirometry recommendations from the Brazilian Thoracic Association - 2024 update.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025Guideline
- Penicillin Allergy Labels, Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Use, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: A Population-Based Cohort Study from China.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Post-lung transplant surveillance in 2026: current practice, variability, and the need for standardization.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Review
- Phenotypes and Trajectories of Tobacco-exposed Persons with Preserved Spirometry: Insights from Lung Volumes.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Comparison between patients with COPD and healthy subjects on spatiotemporal, moment and kinematic parameters: A quasi-experimental study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- The Role of Pulmonary Function Testing in the Diagnosis and Management of COPD.Respiratory care · 2023Review
- Prevalence of abnormal spirometry in individuals with a smoking history and no known obstructive lung disease.Respiratory medicine · 2023Article
- Reversible Airflow Obstruction Predicts Future Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Development in the SPIROMICS Cohort: An Observational Cohort Study.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022Observational
- The prevalence and physiological impacts of centrilobular and paraseptal emphysema on computed tomography in smokers with preserved ratio impaired spirometry.ERJ open research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
32 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMild expiratory flow limitation may not be recognized using traditional spirometric criteria based on the ratio of FEV RESEARCH QUESTION: Does slow vital capacity (SVC) instead of FVC increase the sensitivity of spirometry to identify patients with early or mild obstructive lung disease? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe included 854 current and former smokers from the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study cohort with a postbronchodilator FEV
resultsParticipants with FEV
interpretationLow FEV TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01969344T4; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.