Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539682›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2021

Native Isolation of 3×HA-Tagged Protein Complexes to Characterize Protein-Protein Interactions.

JiaWen Lim, Thomas Iftner, Claudia Simon

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

JiaWen LimInstitute of Medical Virology, Medical Faculty, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Thomas IftnerInstitute of Medical Virology, Medical Faculty, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Claudia SimonInstitute of Medical Virology, Medical Faculty, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) is a straightforward method that is widely used in studying direct protein-protein interactions in physiological environments. This technique is based on the antigen-antibody interaction: the protein of interest (bait) is captured by a specific antibody, followed by antibody-bait precipitation. The proteins interacting with the bait protein (prey) co-precipitate with the antibody-bait complex from a cell lysate as an antibody-bait/prey complex. Nowadays, a variety of surface-functionalized materials with antibodies immobilized on agarose or magnetic beads are available, replacing the precipitation of antibodies and simplifying the application. However, unspecific binding of cellular proteins to matrix surfaces and/or antibodies has become a common issue. Unspecific binding that leads to false-positive signals and a high background can hamper further analysis. Our protocol describes a strategy to tremendously reduce unspecific background when isolating native proteins and protein complexes. Instead of eluting our samples under denaturing conditions, we elute triple hemagglutinin (3×HA)-tagged bait/prey complexes in their native form with a competitive peptide simulating the 3×HA tag of the bait protein. Matrix-unspecific interacting proteins and Co-IP antibodies remain on the matrix instead of being eluted under conventionally applied denaturing conditions. We optimized the elution by altering incubation time, eluent concentration, and temperature. These improvements result in more pure proteins. This strategy not only reduces background in SDS-PAGE and western blot but also allows complex characterization in vitro. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

AntibodiesProteinsElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelImmunoprecipitationAntibodiesProteinsco-immunoprecipitationnative elutionnative protein complexesprotein interactionpull down

Identifiers

PMID33539682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.