Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539540›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021

A Phase I dose-escalation study of two cycles carboplatin-olaparib followed by olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer.

Jill J J Geenen, Gwen M H E Dackus, Philip C Schouten, Dick Pluim, Serena Marchetti, Gabe S Sonke, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alwin D R Huitema, Jos H Beijnen, Jan H M Schellens and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Synthetic Lethality in Ovarian Cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jill J J GeenenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7712-4835
Gwen M H E DackusDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip C SchoutenDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick PluimDivision of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Serena MarchettiDivision of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gabe S SonkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katarzyna JóźwiakBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Germany.
Alwin D R HuitemaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos H BeijnenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan H M SchellensFaculty of Science, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sabine C LinnDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-0347
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUtrecht University · NLDutch Cancer Society · NLMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEPharmo Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical studies have shown synergistic effects when combining PARP1/2 inhibitors and platinum drugs in BRCA1/2 mutated cancer cell models. After a formulation change of olaparib from capsules to tablets, we initiated a dose finding study of olaparib tablets bidaily (BID) continuously with carboplatin to prepare comparative studies in this patient group. Patients were included in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation schedule: olaparib 25 mg BID and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 3 mg*min/mL d1/d22, olaparib 25 mg BID and carboplatin AUC 4 mg*min/mL d1/d22, followed by increasing dose-levels of olaparib from 50 mg BID, 75 mg BID, to 100 mg BID with carboplatin at AUC 4 mg*min/mL d1/d22. After two cycles, patients continued olaparib 300 mg BID as monotherapy. Primary objective was to assess the maximum tolerable dose (MTD). Twenty-four patients with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced cancer were included. Most common adverse events were nausea (46%), fatigue (33%) and platelet count decrease (33%). Dose-level 3 (olaparib 75 mg BID and carboplatin AUC 4 mg*min/mL; n = 6) was defined as MTD. Fourteen out of 24 patients (56%) had a partial response as best response (RECIST 1.1). Systemic exposure of the olaparib tablet formulation appeared comparable to the previous capsule formulation with olaparib tablet AUC

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapsulesCarboplatinDrug Administration ScheduleDrug SynergismFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhthalazinesPiperazinesCapsulesCarboplatinolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesTabletsBRCA mutationcarboplatinolaparibphase I

Identifiers

PMID33539540
PMCPMC8248128
OpenAlexW3127034180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.