Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539437›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Recombinase polymerase amplification assay combined with a dipstick-readout for rapid detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infections.

Sandeep K Gupta, Qing Deng, Tanushree B Gupta, Paul Maclean, Joerg Jores, Axel Heiser, D Neil Wedlock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The establishment and optimization of aMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  3. Laboratory tools for the direct detection of bacterial respiratory infections and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandeep K GuptaAnimal Health, AgResearch, Hopkirk Research Institute, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9746-0075
Qing DengAnimal Health, AgResearch, Hopkirk Research Institute, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Tanushree B GuptaFood Safety & Assurance, AgResearch, Hopkirk Research Institute, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Paul MacleanBioinformatics and Statistics, AgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Joerg JoresInstitute of Veterinary Bacteriology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3790-5746
Axel HeiserAnimal Health, AgResearch, Hopkirk Research Institute, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
D Neil WedlockAnimal Health, AgResearch, Hopkirk Research Institute, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
AgResearch · NZUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infects both sheep and goats causing pneumonia resulting in considerable economic losses worldwide. Current diagnosis methods such as bacteriological culture, serology, and PCR are time consuming and require sophisticated laboratory setups. Here we report the development of two rapid, specific and sensitive assays; an isothermal DNA amplification using recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and a real-time PCR for the detection of M. ovipneumoniae. The target for both assays is a specific region of gene WP_069098309.1, which encodes a hypothetical protein and is conserved in the genome sequences of ten publicly available M. ovipneumoniae strains. The RPA assay performed well at 39°C for 20 min and was combined with a lateral flow dipstick (RPA-LFD) for easy visualization of the amplicons. The detection limit of the RPA-LFD assay was nine genome copies of M. ovipneumoniae per reaction and was comparable to sensitivity of the real-time PCR assay. Both assays showed no cross-reaction with 38 other ovine and caprine pathogenic microorganisms and two parasites of ruminants, demonstrating a high degree of specificity. The assays were validated using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and nasal swab samples collected from sheep. The positive rate of RPA-LFD (97.4%) was higher than the real-time PCR (95.8%) with DNA as a template purified from the clinical samples. The RPA assay was significantly better at detecting M. ovipneumoniae in clinical samples compared to the real-time PCR when DNA extraction was omitted (50% and 34.4% positive rate for RPA-LFD and real-time PCR respectively). The RPA-LFD developed here allows easy and rapid detection of M. ovipneumoniae infection without DNA extraction, suggesting its potential as a point-of-care test for field settings.

Indexed as

AnimalsMycoplasma ovipneumoniaeNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPlasmidsPneumonia, MycoplasmaReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRecombinasesRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID33539437
PMCPMC7861559
OpenAlexW3128017914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.