Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539436›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Cell-free tumour DNA analysis detects copy number alterations in gastro-oesophageal cancer patients.

Karin Wallander, Jesper Eisfeldt, Mats Lindblad, Daniel Nilsson, Kenny Billiau, Hassan Foroughi, Magnus Nordenskjöld, Agne Liedén, Emma Tham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Review of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Esophageal Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karin WallanderDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jesper EisfeldtDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats LindbladDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel NilssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kenny BilliauDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hassan ForoughiDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6925-9040
Magnus NordenskjöldDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Agne LiedénDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma ThamDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6079-164X
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalysis of cell-free tumour DNA, a liquid biopsy, is a promising biomarker for cancer. We have performed a proof-of principle study to test the applicability in the clinical setting, analysing copy number alterations (CNAs) in plasma and tumour tissue from 44 patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer.

methodsDNA was isolated from blood plasma and a tissue sample from each patient. Array-CGH was applied to the tissue DNA. The cell-free plasma DNA was sequenced by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing using a clinical pipeline for non-invasive prenatal testing. WISECONDOR and ichorCNA, two bioinformatic tools, were used to process the output data and were compared to each other.

resultsCancer-associated CNAs could be seen in 59% (26/44) of the tissue biopsies. In the plasma samples, a targeted approach analysing 61 regions of special interest in gastro-oesophageal cancer detected cancer-associated CNAs with a z-score >5 in 11 patients. Broadening the analysis to a whole-genome view, 17/44 patients (39%) had cancer-associated CNAs using WISECONDOR and 13 (30%) using ichorCNA. Of the 26 patients with tissue-verified cancer-associated CNAs, 14 (54%) had corresponding CNAs in plasma. Potentially clinically actionable amplifications overlapping the genes VEGFA, EGFR and FGFR2 were detected in the plasma from three patients.

conclusionsWe conclude that low-coverage whole-genome sequencing without prior knowledge of the tumour alterations could become a useful tool for cell-free tumour DNA analysis of total CNAs in plasma from patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID33539436
PMCPMC7861431
OpenAlexW3127084636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.